Before I start getting stuck into the fairly controversial
subject of ‘umpiring’, take a moment and think back to the most enjoyable
matches you've ever played in. Can you recall any incidents with umpires in
such games? I bet you can’t. Umpires have the ability to make or break a game,
but ensuring the game runs smoothly and remains enjoyable is no easy task. It
only takes one lapse of concentration, leading to an important decision being
based on an educated guess, to change the entire atmosphere of a game.
What we must realise as players, is that any umpire, regardless of qualifications or experience will eventually make a mistake, it is after all human nature to balls things up. This is where the decision review system prevalent in international tournaments acts as a form of ‘get out of jail free card’ for umpires who've drifted off to think about what they’re going to have for dinner when they get home, and in turn miss a potential result determining, last minute foot in the ‘D’.
What we must realise as players, is that any umpire, regardless of qualifications or experience will eventually make a mistake, it is after all human nature to balls things up. This is where the decision review system prevalent in international tournaments acts as a form of ‘get out of jail free card’ for umpires who've drifted off to think about what they’re going to have for dinner when they get home, and in turn miss a potential result determining, last minute foot in the ‘D’.
Unfortunately the review system hasn't worked its way into
the domestic game, probably as it involves filming the match to then review if
called upon. Personally I think nominating a member of the ‘crowd’ to film and
act as a stand-in 3rd umpire would be amusing, but would probably
cause more problems than it would solve.
Poor umpiring, especially in the lower leagues where umpires
aren't appointed is forgiveable, however the problem arises when umpires
officiate dishonestly. We've all experienced the classic 'first one' excuse:
But why do they do it? Why not be honest and just admit that they've not seen
the offence? Well, appointed umpires have a ‘reputation’ to uphold as they’ll
have achieved at least the prestigious level 1 qualification and therefore will
not want to appear out of control. But some umpires need to realise that they
ruin matches by attempting to become too involved and not letting the game
flow. If I had been given a pound for every time I've turned up to a game,
recognised the umpire and thought, this is going to be ‘fun’, I’d be a rich yet still grumpy man.
I wanted to see whether you, the hockey community, had any
funny stories to tell regarding incidents with umpires, or whether I just need
to bite the bullet and show the hockey police more respect. Here are some of the best responses
tweeted in:
If these examples don’t scream
inconsistency/incompetence then you should consider doing your level 1 umpiring
qualification, seriously, you’d fit right in.
Oh and whatever you do, don’t let your potty-mouthed coach
loose on an umpire or else there’s a good chance this will happen:
In all honesty though, if you’re one of the good guys then
thank you for doing a great job and letting us players get on worrying about
not stopping the ball, or giving away possession to the opposition’s centre
forward etc. Thanks to everyone who tweeted in with their umpiring stories. If
you're still reading by this point I'd appreciate it if you could share this with other hockey players, or umpires if you fancy an argument, Cheers!
Charlie